Is an offeror's inability to supply its resources a valid reason for the government to provide GFP?

The correct choice emphasizes that an offeror's inability to supply its own resources does not warrant government-furnished property (GFP). The rationale behind this is grounded in the principles of contract management and the responsibilities of offerors in fulfilling their contractual obligations.

When an offeror enters into a contract with the government, it is expected to have the necessary capabilities, resources, and preparations to execute the contract successfully. If a contractor lacks the ability to provide required resources, it raises concerns about their overall capability and preparedness to fulfill the contract terms. As such, the government typically does not provide additional support, including GFP, because doing so could set a precedent that encourages contractors to rely on government assistance rather than investing in their own resources and solutions.

Providing GFP is generally reserved for scenarios where it is essential for achieving the contract objectives or where the government has specific assets that need to be used to fulfill public functions. Consequently, limited capability on the part of the offeror is not a sufficient justification for the government to step in and furnish resources.