What happens if restrictive language is used in a Performance Work Statement (PWS)?

Using restrictive language in a Performance Work Statement (PWS) can limit full and open competition because it often narrows the number of potential contractors who can fulfill the requirements of a contract. A PWS should ideally provide clear and broad specifications that allow various contractors to submit bids. However, when the language becomes overly specific or includes particular brand names, technologies, or methods that only a few contractors may possess, it creates barriers to entry for others.

This situation can result in a lack of diverse submissions, which could lead to higher costs, reduced innovation, and less competitive pricing. The intent of regulations governing federal contracting is to foster competition, so using restrictive language runs counter to those principles. Thus, the correct answer emphasizes the negative impact of such language on competitive opportunity in contracting processes.