What is true regarding the contractor's inability to supply its own resources?

The assertion that a contractor's inability to supply its own resources should not be a reason for furnishing property aligns with the principles of contract management and responsibility. In contractual agreements, contractors are generally expected to provide their own resources to fulfill the terms of the contract. If a contractor cannot meet this obligation, it reflects on their capability and financial health, necessitating careful evaluation.

Furnishing government property to a contractor simply because they cannot supply their own resources sets a precedent that could undermine the contractual responsibility. This can lead to dependency on government-provided resources rather than encouraging contractors to develop and maintain their own capabilities. It is crucial to ensure that contractors are prepared to manage their resources effectively before receiving government property.

Factors such as justifying the use of government property, the necessity for contract re-evaluation, or formally documenting the situation may be relevant in different contexts, but they do not justify providing property to a contractor unable to meet basic resource requirements. Instead, these scenarios call for exploring more sustainable solutions that reinforce contractual objectives and the independent functioning of the contractor.