Which of the following is NOT a type of termination mentioned?

Termination for neglect is not recognized as a specific type of termination in contracting practices. The other options represent legitimate and commonly used types of termination in contracts.

Termination for convenience allows a party to end the contract without cause, usually after providing appropriate notice. This is often included in contract terms to allow flexibility for the contracting parties.

Termination for default occurs when one party fails to meet the obligations outlined in the contract, such as violating terms or not delivering services or goods as agreed. This provides a legal basis for the non-breaching party to terminate the contract.

Termination for mutual agreement happens when both parties agree to end the contract, which can be beneficial for both parties depending on the circumstances.

In summary, while the other types of termination are formally defined and recognized, termination for neglect is not a standard term used in contracting, which makes it the correct answer to the question.